- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:52:05 +0100
- To: 3668 FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Hello, Minutes of todays call in html http://www.w3.org/2011/02/09-webfonts-minutes.html and text WebFonts Working Group Teleconference 09 Feb 2011 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/02/09-webfonts-irc Attendees Present Vlad, Erik, Jonathan, Chris, Christopher, Sergey, Tal, sylvain Regrets Chair Vlad Scribe ChrisL Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Action Items 2. [5]file format tests 3. [6]same origin restriction 4. [7]next calls * [8]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 09 February 2011 uh-oh, Zakim is confused <jfkthame> "this conference is restricted at this time" ? zakim thinks our booking is at the later time, 10pm france not 4pm france [9]http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20110209 [9] http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20110209 ok, zakim is not confused. the agenda was confused about which week this is <jfkthame> aha <jfkthame> ok, ttyl i guess! last week was the earlier time, but last week was also cancelled Vlad, see you in a few hours, then? <Vlad> Why is this happening? because this is a late week not an early week <Vlad> It shoes that our previous call (last week) has also been scheduled at 10 pm France <Vlad> Did we loose our altenate time schedule? no For 2 Feb I see 15: 00-16:00Z IA_Fonts and for today I see 21: 00-22:00Z IA_Fonts <Vlad> So, if Feb. 02 hae been 10 pm, ths week shoudl be 4 pm CET, right? <sylvaing> my calendar is definitely on for 7am PST <jfkthame> for 2 feb i see both times [10]http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D2011020 9 [10] http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20110209 ah. yes, so do I <jfkthame> also both times for 16 feb and 23 feb <sylvaing> this is like some kind of quantum scheduling <sylvaing> meeting is in both states at the same time <jfkthame> or perhaps neither? <sylvaing> yes <jfkthame> it's a heisenmeeting I will need to talk to the admin staff to see what is happening <sylvaing> (insert Twilight Zone music) <sylvaing> (..and witty comment on the need for same-origin meeting time) <Vlad> So, what do we do for today? Do we reschedule for later or cancel until next week? I suggest reschedule for later <sylvaing> but then what is meeting time next week ? <Vlad> Okay, I will send a notice to WG list looking at the calendar over a longer period, it looks as if the later call has been scheduled weekly (despite what the booking says) and the earlier call every two weeks I willtalk to the admin staff and get it sorted out <sylvaing> all right. so talk again in 6 hours today ? yup in my personal calendar today was an early week, and it was set like that months ago <sylvaing> same here <Vlad> I just sent a msg to the WG list announcing the change for today, hope you guys can make it. <Vlad> Check the email trackbot, start telcon <trackbot> Meeting: WebFonts Working Group Teleconference <trackbot> Date: 09 February 2011 oh yes it has, Zakim <jfkthame> is zakim not paying attention to the phone today? actions at [11]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/open [11] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/open <scribe> ScribeNick: ChrisL Action Items action-29? <trackbot> ACTION-29 -- John Hudson to review woff faq with chris and vlad -- due 2010-10-06 -- OPEN <trackbot> [12]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/29 [12] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/29 Vlad: John sent in some good text, i made some comments ChrisL: plan to add the text that John sent in, we can always further revise later close action-29 <trackbot> ACTION-29 Review woff faq with chris and vlad closed <scribe> ACTION: chris to edit WOFF faq with Johns text incorporating Vlad's corrections [recorded in [13]http://www.w3.org/2011/02/09-webfonts-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-73 - Edit WOFF faq with Johns text incorporating Vlad's corrections [on Chris Lilley - due 2011-02-16]. action-48? <trackbot> ACTION-48 -- Tal Leming to create UA test for bad metadata -- due 2010-11-24 -- OPEN <trackbot> [14]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/48 [14] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/48 close action-48 <trackbot> ACTION-48 Create UA test for bad metadata closed close action-49 <trackbot> ACTION-49 Update UA test plan to include new "fringe" tests. closed close action-50 <trackbot> ACTION-50 Update font format test plan to include new "fringe" tests. closed Tal: I did those action-52? <trackbot> ACTION-52 -- Chris Lilley to respond to erik muller on pronunciation and sorting -- due 2010-12-08 -- OPEN <trackbot> [15]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/52 [15] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/52 ChrisL: not done yet action-57? <trackbot> ACTION-57 -- Jonathan Kew to respons on issue-14 -- due 2011-01-26 -- OPEN <trackbot> [16]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/57 [16] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/57 jfkthame: still working on that one Vlad: direction attributes inside element. But issue is text in attributes ... so our conclusion was that font vendor names don't need directin attributes anyway jfkthame: direction applies to the attribute, the only thing you can't do ia add markup in attributes. We agreed to add direction to all elements Vlad: and direction can be based on Unicode rules, for simple text ... Chris and Richard discussed but there was no conclusion ChrisL: need to propose a solution to Richard and see what he says action-58? <trackbot> ACTION-58 -- Tal Leming to revise test cases to allow multiple credit elements -- due 2011-01-26 -- OPEN <trackbot> [17]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/58 [17] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/58 action-59? <trackbot> ACTION-59 -- Chris Lilley to respond to I18n-ISSUE-2 -- due 2011-01-26 -- OPEN <trackbot> [18]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/59 [18] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/59 Chris: that one is easy, will do soon action-60> action-61? <trackbot> ACTION-61 -- Chris Lilley to provide samples and respond to I18n -- due 2011-01-26 -- OPEN <trackbot> [19]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/61 [19] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/61 ChrisL: ok so this is the div and span one ... 62 is waiting for action-61 action-64? <trackbot> ACTION-64 -- Jonathan Kew to remove normative statements from introduction to new section 'General Requirements' -- due 2011-01-26 -- OPEN <trackbot> [20]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/64 [20] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/64 jfkthame: done today close action-64 <trackbot> ACTION-64 Remove normative statements from introduction to new section 'General Requirements' closed [21]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/webfonts/WOFF/spec/Overview.html [21] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/webfonts/WOFF/spec/Overview.html close action-64 <trackbot> ACTION-64 Remove normative statements from introduction to new section 'General Requirements' closed close action-66 <trackbot> ACTION-66 Edit spec 'this element may be localised' replaced 'this element may be localised using text child element' closed close action-67 <trackbot> ACTION-67 Edit section 6, past paragraph: 'at least one text sub element' replaced by 'at least one text child element'. closed close action-68 <trackbot> ACTION-68 General replacement: 'sub elements' to 'child elements' closed close action-70 <trackbot> ACTION-70 Replace last sentence of section 7: End of Private Data block must correspond with the end of the last file. closed close action-71 <trackbot> ACTION-71 Clarify Bert Bos' Point 4 closed close action-72 <trackbot> ACTION-72 Respond to Bert Bos' Point 5. closed ChrisL: still need to update disposition of comments document for these emails ... szilles accepted the comments that were sent action chrisl to update disposition of comments <trackbot> Created ACTION-74 - Update disposition of comments [on Chris Lilley - due 2011-02-16]. file format tests tal: blanket 'is file valid' is not very good for debugging. many reasons for invalidity ... looking for a machine readable fault report ... to be linked to ... other than that, these are straightforward ... will work on authoring tool tests next. Not clear on best structure ... can give sfnt, xml and private then validate the output ... lots of things the spec says about padding, but rhe compression variability makes it hard to ensure they do the right thing Vlad: we should review the format tests tal: yes, though after spec updates are done ChrisL: (explains last call exit and cr entrance policy in process) same origin restriction Vlad: we don't have an official comment but we do have two implementors who say they won't implement ... so is this a last call comment or not ... better to sort it out before entering CR ChrisL: agreed Vlad: other opinions? ... Hakon made a proposal in email cslye: agree with Vlad, need a more pointed discussion. currently we have implementors saying they will ignore it if its in the spec ... process is to get consensus first. we should resolve it Vlad: so we have IE9 and Frefox who implemented it and Chrome may (Tab is not against) sylvain: lets see when they check it in ... need to split the mechanics from whether its a requirement or not ... do we feel some form of SOR is required or not ... several ways to solve it Vlad: yes we need to solve this and get it behind us cslye: dave singer said he would get back to us Vlad: Maciej joined the WG recently, so its good to see further active participation from Apple sylvaing: opera have not closed the door, they made a counter prooposal and are still talking Vlad: (checks charter for specific mentionof SOR) sylvaing: IE9 will ship with current solution, so even if we change later we have that to deal with "This specification will reference the font formats in existing use (OpenType, WOFF, SVG, and EOT), the font referencing and linking specifications (in both CSS and XML serialisations), access policies such as same-origin and CORS, and define which linking mechanisms, policies and formats are required for compliance." sylvaing: we also depend on CORS which is not a Rec. Even worse if we depend on a new thing not even FPWD yet ChrisL: gan go to PR then holding pattern for Rec. ... or put conformance in a separate spec sylvaing: not want the format to be held back Vlad: sooner the better next calls ChrisL: Zakim booking is correct again, same pattern as previously Vlad: next telcon will be dedicated to the CORs/SOR issue ... some regrets in March due to travel ChrisL: same for me first week of March <cslye> I can't do Mar 2 either, FWIW. Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: chris to edit WOFF faq with Johns text incorporating Vlad's corrections [recorded in [22]http://www.w3.org/2011/02/09-webfonts-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes] -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 21:55:09 UTC