- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:22:06 -0500
- To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Cc: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 22 November 2010 15:22:56 UTC
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:15 AM, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com> wrote: > Dave Crossland wrote: > > On 22 November 2010 21:48, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com> wrote: >> >>> Our of interest, what currently happens when this option is used to save >>> pages that use @font-face to link to naked TTFs? >>> >> > Currently Chromium and Firefox do not implement saving linked fonts in >> any format, which I consider to be a bug. >> > > See, I don't, because I wouldn't consider a particular font to be part of > the *content* of the web page, and the fact that CSS provides for a list of > fallback fonts is a clear indicator that a particular font is not part of > the content of the page but is only one possible way of *displaying* the > page. > With the same reasoning can't you also argue that CSS is categorically not part of the *content* of the web page and hence should not be saved?! behdad
Received on Monday, 22 November 2010 15:22:56 UTC