- From: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 21:44:11 -0700
- To: David Berlow <dberlow@fontbureau.com>
- CC: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
David Berlow wrote: > But I believe in the long term the best purpose of > metadata is to enable web authors to use font information to make > typographic content more accessible to users. > I think that users will want to check to see if the author whose site > they are browsing has used the fonts according to the metadata. And, I > think "who made it" is low on the author's and user's list when it comes > to useful web font metadata. Are you talking here specifically in terms of WOFF file metadata, or font metadata more generally? Recommendations for font use that relate to typography, i.e. to best use of the font, seem to me font-level metadata, rather than container-level metadata, and I would expect to find them in the font data, e.g. in your 'epar' table, rather than in the WOFF metadata. Since WOFF is designed so that individual font data tables can be separately unpacked, I'm not sure whether there would be a benefit to including such information in the WOFF metadata in addition to or instead of in the font data. And when I say I'm not sure, I mean that I don't know, not that I'm dismissing the possibility. JH
Received on Friday, 28 May 2010 04:44:47 UTC