- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 15:08:17 +0000
- To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- CC: David Berlow <dberlow@fontbureau.com>, "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
> From: John Hudson [mailto:tiro@tiro.com] > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 8:23 PM > > What EOT did has no relevance to WOFF. > > That is what I would like to be explicitly stated with regard to > embedding bits. I understand that. I didn't understand why it needed to be stated since there is no relationship or dependency between these formats. But if it helps reset the expectations of those who produce EOT - or will produce EOT, until such time as the IE installed base supports a common format - then sure. (As long as we don't mention EOT)
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 15:08:55 UTC