- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 15:29:02 +0200
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
On Monday, May 10, 2010, 2:49:53 AM, John wrote: JD> I'd like to propose using this week's call to go through the JD> entire submitted WOFF spec section by section. Tedious as that JD> may sound, I think it would help focus the discussion and JD> highlight potential issues or areas of concern. I agree, that is what I was suggesting too: >I would like to see us walk through the spec, as a group. Either in >email or on a call. Partly to ensure we are all up to speed, partly >to look for ambiguous wording, and partly to look for missing, >essential features if there are any. JD> For any point that seems to require deeper discussion or JD> explanation we can note the section and discuss it on the list or during later telecons. Sounds like a good way to cover the whole spec and not get bogged down. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 10 May 2010 13:29:08 UTC