- From: Laurence Penney <lorp@lorp.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:03:58 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>, 3668 FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On 21 Jun 2010, at 19:36, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: > LP> Should the value be entity-encoded or not? > > Why on earth would you want to entiry encode it (or base-64 encode > it, or whatever other obfuscation) when it could be included directly? For the sake of a guaranteed, predictably simple document structure. One danger: What if the included unencoded XML uses elements already used in the metadata? Some clients would barf on the unexpected attributes and content of those elements. It seems I'm in a minority, possibly of one, on this issue of sandboxing the content... - L
Received on Monday, 21 June 2010 20:11:57 UTC