- From: Laurence Penney <lorp@lorp.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:37:06 +0100
- To: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
- Cc: www-font@w3.org, 3668 FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Could you point to where these restrictions are listed? If you're talking about Ruby markup (or any angle-bracket markup), then I'm not sure why such markup would not be encoded with < and > and quotes as entities - whether <bar>text</bar> or <foo bar="text"/> - L On 19 Jun 2010, at 13:59, James Cloos wrote: >>>>>> "LV" == Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com> writes: > > LV> <item [lang="tag"] name="property_name1" value="property_value1"/> > > Aren't tag attrib strings overly limited in what strings they can > support? Doesn't that make the above the wrong way to XML-ize? > > Every previous discussion I've read or participated in has concluded > that it should always be: > > <foo><bar>text</bar></foo> > > and never: > > <foo bar="text"/> > > Why is this discussion suddenly going in the opposite direction? > > -JimC > -- > James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
Received on Saturday, 19 June 2010 21:37:42 UTC