- From: Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:49:03 +0100
- To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com>
- Cc: "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On 18 Jun 2010, at 21:40, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote: > Thank you Jonathan, great job getting the spec finished right on time! > > I have some minor comments: > > 1) Status of the document > The second paragraph was kept the same as the original text of the Submission. We need to verify with Chris whether this is correct. My understanding is that once the submission is accepted and WG started working on it, the subsequent publications are initiated on behalf of W3C and the status should reflect this. Yes, I'm aware that the "boilerplate" at the beginning will need to be updated. I'll work with Chris on this, and get a proper draft online. > > 2) Section 6, description of <vendor>, <credit> and <licensee> elements: the description of attribute 'name' (for each element) says "if the <...> element is present, this attribute must be present". > Suggestion: to simplify the language and use unified XML terminology, change the descriptions to say "This is a required attribute" (XML attributes are defined within the scope of an element). Thanks for the suggestion; I'll take a look at that section. Jonathan
Received on Friday, 18 June 2010 20:49:41 UTC