- From: Sergey Malkin <sergeym@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 00:07:55 +0000
- To: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com>
- CC: "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
> I think, based on what appears to be the common practice, that we should consider this last-table padding to be standard in sfnt files. You are right, there is evidence in OT spec about padding after last table. But since I've seen both cases, I do not think we can easily prohibit either of them. > It will still generate a .woff file, but gives a warning because decoding back to sfnt will not produce an exact copy of the original. What exactly FireFox is doing? Statement above suggests that you force-padding file regardless of specified size. Is this right? Thanks, Sergey
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 00:10:33 UTC