- From: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 11:15:43 -0700
- CC: www-font@w3.org, public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
Håkon Wium Lie wrote: > Yes. There's much repetition. How about: > <ext lang=en> > EU Greeting: > Message: Hello! > Date: 2010-06-01 > </ext> > > <ext lang=nl> > EU Groet > Bericht: Hallo! > Datum: 2010-06-01 > </ext> > > <ext lang=fr> > EU Salut > Message: Bonjour! > Date: 2010-06-01 > </ext> Doesn't this imply that for every language a complete and parallel set of entries is needed? In practice, it is likely that only some of the metadata will be localised, so this arrangement may result in a lot of redundancy. I agree with Sergey that it makes more sense to group the localised variant strings according to content, as Tal proposes, rather than group them by language. JH
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2010 18:16:24 UTC