- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:29:53 -0600
- To: Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>
- Cc: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, WOFF Working Group FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
how about picking a Unicode code that displays an obvious 'failure-like' indication (like X) if fall-back is to a normal font, putting 'monospaced' in the fallback list, and saying that pass is indicated by 'Pass' and that 'Fail' or 'X' mean failure? On Dec 8, 2010, at 14:16 , Tal Leming wrote: > > On Dec 8, 2010, at 3:07 PM, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote: > >> I would suggest to also add TTF font as one of the fallback options for those cases when the underlying system doesn't render CFF. > > That should be easy enough to do. > >> We may also want to consider using WOFF TTF fonts for these tests. > > The valid WOFFs are in both CFF (001, 002, 003, 004) and TTF (005, 006, 007, 008) flavors. The rest of the test cases use the CFF source because I'm more familiar with those table structures. > > Tal David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2010 20:30:28 UTC