W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webevents@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Draft of Touch Events Extensions Working Group Note available

From: Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:20:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFUtAY-nM-47jJeKFMUWakS2PJrNuH4GO=XMezrqdrsySUve-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: Sangwhan Moon <sangwhan@iki.fi>, Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@mozilla.com>, "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>
Sounds great to me.  Matt, are you OK with that definition?  We still have
some bugs here, but that's certainly our intended behavior for radius.



On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote:

> On 10/23/13 11:44 AM, ext Rick Byers wrote:
>
>> This looks good to me.  My only suggestion is to change the wording
>> around Issue 1 or even resolve it entirely if we're in consensus.  Ideally
>> we should explicitly recommend CSS px as the unit (at least we've fixed
>> bugs in blink to make it so).  No other unit really makes sense I think.  I
>> believe this is also implied by the wording that says "in the same
>> co-ordinate system as screenX".
>>
> So how about:
>
> 1. For the definitions of radiusX and radiusY: s/in pixels of the same/in
> CSS pixels of the same/
>
> 2. Delete what is now Issue 1
>
> Is that what you are proposing? Any objections to that?
>
> -Thanks, ArtB
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
>>
>>     > I just checked-in the first draft of the Touch Events Extensions
>>     Working
>>     > Group Note:
>>     >
>>     > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/**webevents/raw-file/default/**
>> touchevents.html<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/raw-file/default/touchevents.html>
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2013 21:21:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:55 UTC