Re: Moving Touch Events v1 to Recommendation

This looks good to me.


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi, folks–
>
> TimBL (the Director), while generally supportive of moving the Web Events
> spec forward and resolving the WebIDL dependency expeditiously, wasn't
> satisfied with the wording we proposed around conforming only to the WebIDL
> syntax; he wanted for us to make as strong a claim as possible, while not
> exaggerating the conformance we anticipate.
>
> So, PLH and I asked Cameron McCormack, the editor of WebIDL, how he thinks
> we could most accurately and precisely characterized the Touch Events
> spec's conformance criterion for WebIDL, and he suggested some text which
> I've included in the Editor's Draft of the spec [1]. TimBL accepted this
> text.
>
> We believe that this is both accurate and informative, and neither
> overstates nor understates the requirements for an implementation
> conforming to WebIDL in the context of Touch Events.
>
> Assuming this WG is happy with this text, and if we have no objections
> from the WebApps WG (ArtB, can you handle that?), the next step would be to
> move the Web Events spec to Recommendation (possibly as soon as next week).
>
> Is this text acceptable to everyone?
>
> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/**webevents/raw-file/v1/**
> touchevents.html#webidl-**conform<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/raw-file/v1/touchevents.html#webidl-conform>
>
> Regards-
> -Doug
>
>