W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webevents@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Moving Touch Events v1 to Recommendation

From: Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:27:28 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFUtAY9KtoUNtSkSLTf-vu-FWKNsWwyMKS=4p-4z3D8t2VZLRw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote:

> On 9/19/13 3:53 AM, ext Doug Schepers wrote:
>
>> On 9/18/13 8:05 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>
>>> Assuming we still intend to publish the v2 Note, we can of course
>>> eliminate "version 1" from our v1 Recommendation but I'm not sure if
>>> we should or not. Is there a good precedence here? ATM, I don't have
>>> a strong opinion either way.
>>>
>>
>> I don't think removing the "version 1" limits us in making a v2 Note (or
>> not), and if we keep it, it could be confusing to developers or
>> implementers whether there's going to be a normative v2.
>>
>
> Yes, I see your point.
>
> Rick - since you are one of the bigger proponents re the v2 WG Note, I'd
> like to hear from (and anyone else) if Doug's proposal is OK with you.
>

Yep, I'm fine with Doug's proposal.   I agree it's good to avoid sending
any signals that suggest touch events is under active development.


> -Thanks, AB
>
>
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 14:28:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:55 UTC