W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webevents@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Editorial comments for Touch Event specs

From: Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:56:21 -0700
Message-ID: <4E459375.5090107@mozilla.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
CC: "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>
On 08/09/2011 01:15 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> 1. Unless there is a really good reason to include "Specification" in
> the title, it should be removed

I did this when I made the v1/v2 split.

> 2. 4.2 the definition of the identifiedTouch method is confusing
> "returns the first Touch with long identifier from the list". I think
> something closer to the definition @ MDN should be used (modified a bit):
> [...]
> 3. 4.2 the definition of the item method is confusing "returns the Touch
> with index index from the list, sorted in order from latest to
> earliest", especially about the sorting. MDN has a clearer definition
> although instead of "into", perhaps "in":  [...]

Done: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/rev/1a996def96f5
Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 20:57:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:53 UTC