Re: Editorial comments for Touch Event specs

On 08/09/2011 01:15 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> 1. Unless there is a really good reason to include "Specification" in
> the title, it should be removed

I did this when I made the v1/v2 split.

> 2. 4.2 the definition of the identifiedTouch method is confusing
> "returns the first Touch with long identifier from the list". I think
> something closer to the definition @ MDN should be used (modified a bit):
> [...]
> 3. 4.2 the definition of the item method is confusing "returns the Touch
> with index index from the list, sorted in order from latest to
> earliest", especially about the sorting. MDN has a clearer definition
> although instead of "into", perhaps "in":  [...]

Done: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/rev/1a996def96f5

Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 20:57:00 UTC