Wednesday, 25 May 2016
Tuesday, 24 May 2016
- Re: All bugs now in GitHub
- Re: [Web Crypto WG] our call yesterday
- [Web Crypto WG] our call yesterday
- All bugs now in GitHub
- [Bug 27771] Should HKDF' s derive bits operation throw OperationError if length is null?
- [Bug 29438] JSON.stringify as invoked by wrapKey can have side-effects depending on what you pass it
- [Bug 29437] Parsing a JWK can have side-effects if not done very carefully
- [Bug 29569] summary!!!!
- [Bug 29545] ECDSA 'alg' names for JWK: ES512 vs ES521
- [Bug 29539] Invalid algorithm OID for ECDH
- [Bug 29514] Need to define which globals objects created by this spec are associated with
- [Bug 29359] Make the "exceptions" section clearer
- [Bug 29139] Allow specifying numbers in place of BigInteger?
- [Bug 29005] Add support for secp256k1 curve
- [Bug 28551] TODO: create example utility function that converts text -> ArrayBufferView
- [Bug 27946] getRandomValues should mention Uint8ClampedArray
- [Bug 27942] Expose GlobalCrypto in Worker
- [Bug 27816] IANA considerations review for definition of algorithms
- [Bug 27815] IANA Considerations for "ext"
- [Bug 27814] Section A.2 - the usage mapping of "enc" is incorrect
- [Bug 27774] The KDFs either shouldn't allow importing extractable keys, or should support exportKey()
- [Bug 27783] Incompatible specification for how usages is enforced for ECDH
- [Bug 27774] The KDFs either shouldn't allow importing extractable keys, or should support exportKey()
- [Bug 27773] Clarification of unwrapKey method parameters
- [Bug 27772] Typo: "withe" -> "with"
- [Bug 27771] Should HKDF' s derive bits operation throw OperationError if length is null?
- [Bug 27755] Using the Subtle Crypto Interface with Streams
- [Bug 27717] Require RSA key import to validate the key parameters
- [Bug 27702] KeyAlgorithm misses semicolon
- [Bug 27689] Is PBKDF2's generateKey() UI step worthwhile?
- [Bug 27685] References link to PKCS3 is broken
- [Bug 27622] Typo: "Import key" -> "importKey" in section 34.2, 35.2
- [Bug 27621] Inconsistent name for getLength operation
- [Bug 27617] Remove Section 4.3 "Operations" from the spec
- [Bug 27603] verify() can fail either by returning flase or rejecting with an error, inconsistent which is used
- [Bug 27602] ECDSA' s Sign operation is not explicit about how r and s are concatenated ( padding)
- [Bug 27601] Inconsistent enforcement of JWK's "use" versus "key_ops" during public key import
- [Bug 27600] Inconsistent formatting (indentation) of WebIDL blocks
- [Bug 27598] Clarification: Can NotSupportedError be thrown in places where the spec uses an OperationError ?
- [Bug 27591] Must the reflected "publicExponent" for generated RSA keys exactly match input?
- [Bug 27588] Typo "myst" --> "must"
- [Bug 27587] Section 19, Algorithm Overview, does not mention verify() or deriveBits() methods
- [Bug 27586] Incorrect link to "decrypt"
- [Bug 27585] Extraneous "the" in description of wrapKey
- [Bug 27584] Wording: "subtlecrypto methods" --> "SubtleCrypto methods"
Monday, 23 May 2016
- [Bug 27581] Wording: Algorithm names must be unique when compared case-insensitively
- [Bug 27580] "case sensitive" --> "case insensitive"
- [Bug 27579] Inconsistent spelling of "[[ This Document]]"
- [Bug 27578] Outdated reference to JWK spec
- [Bug 27577] Remove unreferenced exceptions
- [Bug 27564] Must conforming implementations match the order of errors?
- [Bug 27563] Consistency: "W3C WebCrypto Working Group" vs " W3C WebCrypto Working Group
- [Bug 27562] Odd wording of section " 2.7. Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)"
- [Bug 27561] Reword RTCWEB --> WebRTC?
- [Bug 27560] Remove reference to "events" in the introduction
- [Bug 27506] Inconsistent error for AES-CTR's "get key length" operation
- [Bug 27486] RsaHashedImportParams does not extend Algorithm
- [Bug 27485] Spelling error "definines"
- [Bug 27474] Editorial Note from Appendix A: Additional JWK-> Algorithm conversions
- [Bug 27473] Explicit salts for the algorithm formerly known as HKDF
- [Bug 27472] RSAHashedKeyGenParams vs. Dictionary Fields Editorial Note
- [Bug 27471] Provide even more informative text over key wrapping?
- [Bug 27465] Update references from X9.63 to SECG
- [Bug 27449] Algorithm normalization references "KeyAlgorithm" rather than "Algorithm"
- [Bug 27448] HmacImportParams having a non-required hash is inconsistent with other algorithms
- [Bug 27447] Inconsistent use of "raw" format for EC keys
- [Bug 27439] Inconsistent naming of the "Get key length" operation
- [Bug 27438] Inconsistent result type for "Result" column of " Get Key length" operation
- [Bug 27425] HKDF-CTR needs a new name
- [Bug 27404] Should check the publicKey's algorithm.name for ECDH' s deriveBits()?
- [Bug 27403] Should PBKDF2 be allowed on non-multiple of 8 lengths for consistency?
- [Bug 27402] Specify the behavior when returning an octet string with a particular _bit_ length
- [Bug 27374] Please remove older Editorial Notes from spec
- [Bug 27305] "Perform type mapping as specified in [WEBIDL] for data."
- [Bug 27298] Reference IDL rather than define a "clone the data" algorithm
- [Bug 27255] Inconsistent handling of SPKI / PKCS#8 data between implementations
- [Bug 25972] Please require a secure origin
- GitHub issue labels
- [Bug 27425] HKDF-CTR needs a new name
- [Bug 27255] Inconsistent handling of SPKI / PKCS#8 data between implementations
- [Bug 27404] Should check the publicKey's algorithm.name for ECDH' s deriveBits()?
- [Bug 29545] ECDSA 'alg' names for JWK: ES512 vs ES521
- [Web Crypto WG] Bug 27783 - Incompatible specification for how usages is enforced for ECDH
- [Web Crypto WG] Call for Consensus : Remove the generate key operation for PBKDF2 --> resolution adopted
- crypto-ACTION-157: Create an issue to remove generatekey for pbkdf2
- Details of our call
- Our call today @ 20:00 UTC
Friday, 20 May 2016
Tuesday, 17 May 2016
- Re: Pull request for IDL testing
- RE: Pull request for IDL testing
- Re: Pull request for IDL testing
- Pull request for IDL testing
Monday, 16 May 2016
Saturday, 14 May 2016
- RE: Testing progress for generateKey
- Re: Testing progress for generateKey
- Re: Testing progress for generateKey
- Re: Testing progress for generateKey
Friday, 13 May 2016
Wednesday, 11 May 2016
- Re: Call next week - any updates on testing?
- Re: Call next week - any updates on testing?
- Re: Call next week - any updates on testing?
- Call next week - any updates on testing?
Tuesday, 3 May 2016
Monday, 2 May 2016
- XMLDSIG and Web Crypto
- XMLDSIG and Web Crypto
- [Web Crypto WG] minutes of our call - 2nd of May
- Re: Testing progress
- Re: Testing progress
- Re: Testing progress
- Re: Testing progress
- Re: Testing progress
- Re: Testing progress
- Re: Testing progress
- Testing progress