[Bug 27564] Must conforming implementations match the order of errors?

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27564

--- Comment #4 from Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> ---
(In reply to jimsch from comment #3)
> Based on my reading of the current section 3 I would disagree that the order
> of errors is strict.  The text states that the algorithms are laid out to be
> understandable not to be high performance (although I have never run across
> the word performant and would probably say it could be changed).  

But also that the observable effects remain the same.

The observable effects include errors.

So yes, the order of errors is strict.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Friday, 4 March 2016 00:35:32 UTC