RE: [W3C Web Crypto] CfC to get back to conf call working method ? (please answer before the 2nd of february)

I agree that resuming regular calls would provide s productive forcing function to help the remaining decisions get made and the specification finished.

-- Mike
________________________________
From: GALINDO Virginie<mailto:Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com>
Sent: ‎1/‎26/‎2016 10:13 AM
To: Ryan Sleevi<mailto:sleevi@google.com>
Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org<mailto:public-webcrypto@w3.org>; Harry Halpin<mailto:hhalpin@w3.org>
Subject: RE: [W3C Web Crypto] CfC to get back to conf call working method ?  (please answer before the 2nd of february)

Ryan,

The agenda of the first one will be :

-          Test suite status

-          State of browser implementations, gap with Web Crypto API

-          Possible timeline the group can reach on the rec track

-          Charter renewal / extension

One of the objective I am also targeting is to rebuild a team/working group spirit – we got few folks joining recently from mozilla and microsoft. We need to have live discussion to reboot and re-motivate the WG, with respect to the recent news (you, resigning from editorship or the block point where we are in terms of implementations versus spec).

I know that you feel this is a waste of time, as this does not correspond to your favorite working method. But as chair, I believe that it will help the WG to progress.

Regards,
Virginie





From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi@google.com]
Sent: mardi 26 janvier 2016 19:04
To: GALINDO Virginie
Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org; Harry Halpin
Subject: Re: [W3C Web Crypto] CfC to get back to conf call working method ? (please answer before the 2nd of february)

Are there concrete agendas for these conference calls? Or are they just status updates?

I do not believe, given the activity, that a conference call would be particularly helpful.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:12 AM, GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com<mailto:Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com>> wrote:
Dear all,

It we have experienced several strong discussions which have affected the roadmap of our working group, Harry and I are proposing that we go back on a bi-weeks conference call. The proposal here is to start meeting every two weeks, starting on the 15th of February.
The rationale for coming into a more active mode is to share on tests suite development and implementers debug progress and align the specification around a real interoperable set of feature. We will keep our call time to Monday @ 20:00 UTC.

Thanks for confirming support or raising objection to that working mode prior to the 2nd of February.

Regards,
Virginie

________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.

________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.