On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > If they don't, then we have no choice but to remove non-interoperable > parts of the spec, but I do not believe that is necessary *if* we can give > one more push at fixing bugs and the spec. > Harry, Strictly speaking, and perhaps this is where the disconnect is, that is not our only choice. We have a plentitude of choices available - including, for example, shutting the WG and publishing the spec as a Note, rechartering as a CG, kicking it over to the Web Incubator CG (or whatever it's called these days). I realize that you're personally invested in seeing something published, by this WG, but that's not the only choice available, nor, as I think we both agree, is it the desirable one.
Received on Friday, 22 January 2016 02:54:59 UTC