Monday, 29 February 2016
Sunday, 28 February 2016
Friday, 26 February 2016
Wednesday, 24 February 2016
Tuesday, 23 February 2016
- Re: Allowing web crypto on non secure origin
- Allowing web crypto on non secure origin
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] charter extension by 6 months
- [W3C Web Crypto] Call for consensus -> moving to github
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] Take away from our call on 22nd of February
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] minutes of our call on 22nd of Feb
Monday, 22 February 2016
- crypto-ACTION-155: Talk with microsoft and mozilla
- RE: General update on CR and test-suite
- General update on CR and test-suite
Sunday, 21 February 2016
Thursday, 11 February 2016
Tuesday, 9 February 2016
- [Bug 29438] JSON.stringify as invoked by wrapKey can have side-effects depending on what you pass it
- [Bug 29437] Parsing a JWK can have side-effects if not done very carefully
- [Bug 29437] Parsing a JWK can have side-effects if not done very carefully
- [Bug 29437] Parsing a JWK can have side-effects if not done very carefully
- [Bug 29438] JSON.stringify as invoked by wrapKey can have side-effects depending on what you pass it
Monday, 8 February 2016
- [Bug 29437] Parsing a JWK can have side-effects if not done very carefully
- [Bug 29438] JSON.stringify as invoked by wrapKey can have side-effects depending on what you pass it
- [Bug 29438] New: JSON.stringify as invoked by wrapKey can have side-effects depending on what you pass it
- [Bug 29437] New: Parsing a JWK can have side-effects if not done very carefully
Wednesday, 3 February 2016
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto] CfC to get back to conf call working method ? --> yes and next call on 15th of february
- [W3C Web Crypto] CfC to get back to conf call working method ? --> yes and next call on 15th of february