- From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:24:55 -0800
- To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
- Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org
Received on Monday, 19 January 2015 18:25:22 UTC
Because it isn't cryptographically suspect in the way it is for RSA. On Jan 19, 2015 10:15 AM, "Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote: > Is there a reason that we did not move the hash for ECDSA from the sign > operation to the import operation when it was done for RSA? > > > > Jim > > >
Received on Monday, 19 January 2015 18:25:22 UTC