- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:26:21 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27814 --- Comment #2 from jimsch <ietf@augustcellars.com> --- That sentence would be one strong argument, I am not sure why you are saying that it is grammatically incorrect however. Remember that for the JOSE working group the following is a key agreement algorithm - ECDH-ES+A128KW. This composite algorithm does do an encryption operation and not just a key wrap algorithm. This difference of opinions is one of the reasons why key_ops needed to be defined, to get a much finer view of what the operations were that were associated with a key. You are thinking in terms what what it means for the algorithm "ECDH" and there is no such algorithm in the JOSE world. This we have the sentence that explicitly states it to be true and we have an explicit example of the usage in the document. I think that is good support for the thinking of the JOSE document editors and working group. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 12 January 2015 21:26:23 UTC