- From: hhalpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 04:33:03 -0500
- To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- Cc: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, public-webcrypto@w3.org
On 2015-12-06 22:24, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 2:37 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > >> Let's call for another call on 12/14 and try to work out all >> remaining >> issues on github and mailing-list before that, and then we can aim >> for >> PR again. Of course, it would be good if editors attended call for >> high-bandwidth communication on the issues if things are still not >> quite >> resolved. > > If we are unable to work out the issues on Github and the mailing > list, will we still have the call? I agree that it is preferable to work out the issues on Github and the mailing list. Nonetheless, it is important to resolve the issues, and a 'high bandwidth' conversation can sometimes help. It is also useful particularly if the chair has to make a decision over some particular blocking issue. > > I'd appreciate it if there was an agenda for the call, as discussed in > the past workmode discussions. It doesn't seem useful to have a call > if there's no progress on anything, and it doesn't seem helpful to > discuss potential causes or alternatives for the lack of progress on > the call, rather than the list. Agreed that an agenda should be sent out earlier, and an agenda should be sent at least 24 hours ahead of time. -- Harry Halpin (W3C/MIT) harry@w3.org
Received on Monday, 7 December 2015 09:33:05 UTC