- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:35:27 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25198 --- Comment #10 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> --- (In reply to Anne from comment #9) > A specification extending another specification without that other > specification needing to be aware of it is rather problematic in my opinion. > How would an implementer of Web Crypto find out about that other > specification? Same way they found out about WebCrypto itself. Such specifications would only be in scope of the W3C WebCrypto working group. > > E.g. HTML defines the canvas API which has an enumeration for a canvas > context which is either 2d or webgl. webgl is defined elsewhere, but its > enumeration is covered by HTML, along with a forward reference. If someone > were to mint a new context, that would have to go through HTML. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 26 September 2014 17:35:28 UTC