- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:01:01 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26301 --- Comment #4 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> --- (In reply to Boris Zbarsky from comment #3) > What exactly would constitute "a proposal"? I thought comment 0 was pretty > clear. > > The HTML and DOM specs both have "throw a ...." language that works well > enough for throwing things. When I look at https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-throw it defines "throw a <string>" in terms of "throw an <object>", but that seems to be all. I understood comment 1 to be questioning whether 'throw an <object>' was well-defined when invoked from sub-algorithms. If it is not well-defined, we need a proposal. The DOM specification seems to explicitly say 'Rethrow any exceptions' when sub-procedures which might throw are invoked. Do we need to do something like that. If you're saying that the propagation of exceptions is well-defined (and Ryan refers to seeing some text to this effect), then I guess we're good to do a global change to the DOMO-like 'throw a <string>' language. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 26 September 2014 16:01:05 UTC