- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 21:37:00 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26320 --- Comment #5 from Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> --- (In reply to Mark Watson from comment #4) > Well, inheritance is a form os use, so they are not unused. > > I left these separate because it seemed like it might be useful to have the > base definitions available for algorithms that use RSA keys without > parameterization with a hash. If the removed RSA-ES is the only such > algorithm that will ever exist, then indeed these dictionaries would never > be used. > > This is entirely editorial anyway. We had great discussions with the TAG and Boris on the non-idiomatic approach to inheritance, with multiple vendors expressing concerns over the "C++ style" API. I think we can and should nuke the inheritance, as it's visible (as has been noted before) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 21:37:01 UTC