- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:06:17 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25618 --- Comment #43 from Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> --- (In reply to Mark Watson from comment #40) > (In reply to Boris Zbarsky from comment #35) > > > > As a theoretical, or practical matter? > > > > Like I said, algorithm optionality is a whole other story ... > > But, if we are being practical, would it work to simply maintain a list - in > a small spec or on a WebCrypto WG web page - of WebCrypto specifications, > which we would point to from the base spec (under the definition of 'other > specifications'). > > This _surely_ solves the practical matter of discoverability, without > invoking the presently-rather-heavy W3C specification update process for > each new extension. Note that W3C has offered to host this web-page and spec BTW. The offer still stands. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 17:06:19 UTC