- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:28:13 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25618 --- Comment #37 from Brian LaMacchia <bal@microsoft.com> --- Using Boris's S1/S2 notation, two points to keep in mind: 1) The desire for S2 often happens later than S1 is implemented, in particular when there's a new cryptographic attack against an algorithm or protocol construction. So it's not "I want to ship S1 and not S2" as much as "I want to ship S1 and have the flexibility to add a new hash algorithm/elliptic curve/KDF/padding mode/whatever in some scenario quickly without needing to reopen S1". 2) As I've said before, this spec is going to be implemented by clients other than browsers. You need to think about the WebCrypto spec as the crypto platform API for JavaScript, wherever that JS runs. --bal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 15:28:15 UTC