- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:15:21 -0700
- To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com>
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEnTvdCn85acZ7zXAXjzq=UHHfM0cGK1O4+myisRqva1-20QyQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:06 AM, GALINDO Virginie < Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com> wrote: > Yeap, Mark, clear, lets keep bugzilla thread, as long as bugs are live > and make progress J > > What about the serie of linked bugs, like error management ? > Typically, if noone comments, I try to make a series of increasingly concrete suggestions to provoke any objections and then go ahead if there are none. This pre-supposes people are actually watching the bug updates on the list, which since our agreed mode of working is on-list is reasonable, I think. On that one, seems like we should convert everything that might possibly be handled by a library to OperationError. ...Mark > Virginie > > > > *From:* Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com] > *Sent:* mercredi 8 octobre 2014 17:07 > *To:* GALINDO Virginie > *Cc:* Harry Halpin; public-webcrypto@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: Closing open bugs by end of week? > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:56 AM, GALINDO Virginie < > Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com> wrote: > > Mark, > > Thanks for your work provided in following bug status. > > Let’s open thread on the mailing list for the ones requiring discussions. > > > > I think the necessary discussions are ongoing on bugzilla. MIght be best > to keep them there to avoid parallel threads on the same topic. > > > > ...Mark > > > > > > Regards, > > Virginie > > > > > > *From:* Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com] > *Sent:* mardi 7 octobre 2014 17:02 > *To:* Harry Halpin > *Cc:* GALINDO Virginie; public-webcrypto@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: Closing open bugs by end of week? > > > > Harry, all, > > > > I added a new tab, 10/7, to the spreadsheet at > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rpc7Q7o4nxoKjYT8Qx4MhueQ-rUuIIM53yp7miUuxnw/edit?usp=sharing > > > > This gives the current bug status. > > > > There are only 2 which are truly editorial and one of those relates to > references which could be fixed with the pubrules fixes after we have made > a decision. > > > > There are several others which are pending discussion, but which I do not > believe should delay exit from Last Call - they are in many cases the kind > of things that might normally be discovered during the implementation > phase, which is typically after CR. We have delayed our specification so > much that several implementations are complete before the "call for > implementations", so we have implementation feedback already [I don't > consider this as getting feedback early in the W3C process but rather that > the W3C process has got way way behind.] > > > > To exit Last Call I believe it is primarily the extensibility issue we > need to resolve. > > > > ...Mark > > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 10/07/2014 03:01 PM, GALINDO Virginie wrote: > > Harry, Quick clarification : as indicated last week, our next > > meeting is on *20th of October*. > > Regardless, we'd need all open bugs that are editorial *closed* by the > 13th to give the WG time to review, in particlar if there are various > decisions. > > cheers, > harry > > > > > This does not prevent us to be ready for next Friday, indeed. > > Virginie > > > > -----Original Message----- From: Harry Halpin > > [mailto:hhalpin@w3.org] Sent: mardi 7 octobre 2014 14:39 To: > > public-webcrypto@w3.org Subject: Closing open bugs by end of week? > > > > Solving remaining bugs: > > > > We *really* need to go to Last Call ASAP. Our next meeting is Oct. > > 13th. Or do we need another week extension? > > > > Here's the list: > > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=Web%20Cryptography%20API%20Document&product=Web%20Cryptography&query_format=advanced > > > > Mark or Ryan - do either of you have time to go through the bugs > > that are still open and do the editorial commits needed to close > > them? > > > > Then, the Working Group still probably isn't quite sure exactly > > what bugs it needs to review due to substantial open issues and > > which ones are minor nit-picks. > > > > For example, there's a few bugs left hanging like this one: > > > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25198 > > > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25706 > > > > I suggest just at least editor just making the changes ASAP even if > > editors do not yet agree (although ideally they agree) and then > > giving everyone time to review. > > > > cheers, harry > > > > ________________________________ This message and any attachments > > are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential > > information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or > > partial, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our > > company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or > > falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, > > please delete it and notify the sender. Although all reasonable > > efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, > > the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted > > virus. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUM+U4AAoJEPgwUoSfMzqcZ1YQAJ2IF19uYhbOxDgX7VsPM0bx > uZs2xozBqfXUsry7fM+tTb1QRuClQqPMmN5FlcfnNjF9UclefJZsV+zMzhKUn8q7 > jK8Tw4RSNv6eKJZyrG02k8/7vk2zVGFLhlw5fA6PU/+mo4qLcXWgIg8z59KODzuZ > 0KAuz3Xh6Byxg236hqGSryXr5T4OHMS71m48vXy5s4sG4a2oCXA14up4lKRyT36F > rbGNMAAefIH6YvX6XAMASk3pKtZo4c1N4CM0QKSUZzWdQpQ62WfxTFbsrVZY7zss > H7WHUmkrmTrPgsa5YAEpFj6KEHGR6Rl11s+8rIK80+4YYFb/UNwJQkICfePLAN/I > ggsmb2AKs9Nd2jeIRH1RvDzcTn3/rIrtwZAH5uFSnOTQajYhiBZY5phXn2w6Ik/I > PUGTMyaTO4gpKC8gUF7Iv/278kpclKoQEj0fGUYnzfDJj5mU8hfwlXvkcjGmt+0R > nMBBMoFwFBQ1OMqjaHeBAwCaO4xrEV1Tdvhye7tV0FM/SkSKBTI1z5lQ1PJksEUp > ZGP6jAHRdtvBDMpxy7n1z6y4XLu+rqnMYsjhn6cAdrj8QS5Q5KPf2DVVlbMVSMYf > LQSQxZr9S7Za9ktt+n5HWlSpFRTPYjk+8cjbqon0bFhHaGNLg93KI4Usd0mZXKjk > TMQhA2bCwf3fYPFCdBEK > =U0me > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > ------------------------------ > > > > *This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees > and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or > disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible > to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, > changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this > message, please delete it and notify the sender. Although all reasonable > efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the > sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.* > > > ------------------------------ > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees > and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or > disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for > the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission > free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a > transmitted virus. >
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 15:15:52 UTC