Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Call for Consensus on moving curve 25519 to a W3C Working Draft

-1

I thought we had agreed to take no action on new curves until the CFRG /
TLSWG process concluded.  AFAICT, it has not.

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:46 PM, GALINDO Virginie <
Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com> wrote:

>  Dear all,
>
>
>
> This is a call for consensus directed to WG participants to have the curve
> 25519 draft provided by Trevor Perrin [1] to become a W3C Working Draft, in
> the Web Crypto WG.
>
> That draft has been discussed with WG members during an informal call on
> the 18th of August [2]. We decided not to make decision to endorse curve
> 25519 in the web crypto API, but rather see it as a candidate for our
> extension/errata process.
>
>
>
> Please answer to this call for consensus before the 5th of December 23:59
> UTC :
>
> -          Indicate in a reply mail (+1) if you agree
>
> -          Indicate in a reply mail (-1) if you object
>
>
>
> While explicit consent is preferable, silence means endorsement (+1) of
> this decision to have this draft becoming a W3C Working Draft.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Virginie
>
> Chair of  Web Crypto WG
>
>
>
> [1]
> http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/trevp/curve25519_webcrypto/blob/master/Curve25519_WebCrypto.html
>
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/08/18-crypto-minutes.html
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees
> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or
> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for
> the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended
> recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission
> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a
> transmitted virus.
>