[Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25839

--- Comment #68 from Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> ---
We have in principle agreed to adopt the draft and did a call with Trevor
Perrin to discuss. 


http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2014Aug/0102.html

As is in-line with the results of our call for consensus that called for CFRG
liaisoning and then putting separate curves in separate documents (as Richard
agreed to). 

Thus, we can put it as an "Editor's Draft" in W3C space. However, yes, we can
also do a separate call out for consensus on the document as a Working Draft.
Will ping Virginie to send out that call for consensus.

We do not, to my knowledge, have a separate NUMS Editor's Draft. Of course, one
can be created at any time and the WG can be alerted. 

However, note we are definitely in the resolved with "LATER" category with the
production and adoption of the Curve 25519 draft and errata-extensibility
mechanism for this long-standing bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 20 November 2014 00:31:03 UTC