Sunday, 30 November 2014
- [Bug 27474] New: Editorial Note from Appendix A: Additional JWK->Algorithm conversions
- [Bug 27473] New: Explicit salts for the algorithm formerly known as HKDF
- [Bug 27472] RSAHashedKeyGenParams vs. Dictionary Fields Editorial Note
- [Bug 27472] New: RSAHashedKeyGenParams vs. Dictionary Fields Editorial Note
- [Bug 27471] New: Provide even more informative text over key wrapping?
- [Bug 25659] AES-CBC mode does not describe concretely how padding is added
- [Bug 27425] HKDF-CTR needs a new name
- [Bug 25345] Set window.crypto and all properties of window.crypto writable to false
- [Bug 25619] Provide (non-normative) explanations for terminology like cryptographic provider
Friday, 28 November 2014
Wednesday, 26 November 2014
- [Bug 27449] New: Algorithm normalization references "KeyAlgorithm" rather than "Algorithm"
- [Bug 27448] New: HmacImportParams having a non-required hash is inconsistent with other algorithms
- [Bug 27447] New: Inconsistent use of "raw" format for EC keys
- [Bug 27439] New: Inconsistent naming of the "Get key length" operation
- [Bug 27438] New: Inconsistent result type for "Result" column of "Get Key length" operation
Tuesday, 25 November 2014
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] status of web crypto api
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] status of web crypto api
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] status of web crypto api
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] status of web crypto api
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] status of web crypto api
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] status of web crypto api
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] status of web crypto api
- [Bug 27425] New: HKDF-CTR needs a new name
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] status of web crypto api
Friday, 21 November 2014
- [Bug 27404] New: Should check the publicKey's algorithm.name for ECDH's deriveBits()?
- [Bug 27403] New: Should PBKDF2 be allowed on non-multiple of 8 lengths for consistency?
- [Bug 27402] New: Specify the behavior when returning an octet string with a particular _bit_ length
- RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Call for Consensus on moving curve 25519 to a W3C Working Draft
- Removing reference to ISSUE-35 from current Last Call Draft before CR
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Call for Consensus on moving curve 25519 to a W3C Working Draft
Thursday, 20 November 2014
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Call for Consensus on moving curve 25519 to a W3C Working Draft
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Call for Consensus on moving curve 25519 to a W3C Working Draft
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Call for Consensus on moving curve 25519 to a W3C Working Draft
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Call for Consensus on moving curve 25519 to a W3C Working Draft
- Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Call for Consensus on moving curve 25519 to a W3C Working Draft
- [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] Call for Consensus on moving curve 25519 to a W3C Working Draft
- RE: Curve 25519 to Working Draft [was Re: CR transition update - some quick editorial updates?]
- [Bug 27374] New: Please remove older Editorial Notes from spec
- [Bug 25607] Need to advise authors about security considerations
- Re: Curve 25519 to Working Draft [was Re: CR transition update - some quick editorial updates?]
- [Bug 27331] deriveBits() has a non-nullable length
- Curve 25519 to Working Draft [was Re: CR transition update - some quick editorial updates?]
- [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve
- [Bug 25985] WebCrypto should be inter-operable
- [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve
- [Bug 25839] Curve25519 Named Curve
Wednesday, 19 November 2014
Tuesday, 18 November 2014
- Re: CR transition update - some quick editorial updates?
- RE: CR transition update - some quick editorial updates?
Monday, 17 November 2014
- Re: CR transition update - some quick editorial updates?
- Re: CR transition update - some quick editorial updates?
- CR transition update - some quick editorial updates?
- [Bug 27331] deriveBits() has a non-nullable length
Saturday, 15 November 2014
Wednesday, 12 November 2014
Tuesday, 11 November 2014
- [Bug 27305] "Perform type mapping as specified in [WEBIDL] for data."
- [Bug 27305] "Perform type mapping as specified in [WEBIDL] for data."
- [Bug 27305] New: "Perform type mapping as specified in [WEBIDL] for data."
- [Bug 27298] New: Reference IDL rather than define a "clone the data" algorithm
Saturday, 8 November 2014
- [Bug 26322] Definitions "algorithm" and "usages" properties of CryptoKey make no sense
- [Bug 26322] Definitions "algorithm" and "usages" properties of CryptoKey make no sense
- [Bug 26322] Definitions "algorithm" and "usages" properties of CryptoKey make no sense
- [Bug 26322] Definitions "algorithm" and "usages" properties of CryptoKey make no sense
- [Bug 26322] Definitions "algorithm" and "usages" properties of CryptoKey make no sense
- [Bug 26322] Definitions "algorithm" and "usages" properties of CryptoKey make no sense
Friday, 7 November 2014
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] F2F meeting take away - 30 Oct in Santa Clara
- [Bug 27262] Two minor typos in JWK fields
Thursday, 6 November 2014
- [Bug 27262] New: Two minor typos in JWK fields
- [Bug 27255] New: Inconsistent handling of SPKI / PKCS#8 data between implementations