- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 17:42:13 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25839 Brian LaMacchia <bal@microsoft.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bal@microsoft.com --- Comment #5 from Brian LaMacchia <bal@microsoft.com> --- I would object to adding only Curve25519 to the list of named curves if we're going to open up the NamedCurve list to curves beyond the NIST prime curves. MSR recently published a paper [1] defining new Weierstrass curves that are faster than the corresponding NIST curves at the same security level and meet all the requirements of the SafeCurves project. The Brainpool curves (which already have an IETF RFC) are also popular in non-NIST circles. So, at a minimum, if we open up the NamedCurve to add Curve25519 then we should also add the Brainpool curves and the MSR curves. [1] http://eprint.iacr.org/2014/130 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2014 17:42:15 UTC