- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 01:11:59 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25839 --- Comment #3 from Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> --- (In reply to Matt Corallo from comment #2) > Feature at risk seems reasonable, however I think the (apparent) demand for > curve25519 would merit placing it in the spec. Also, there are a number of > inter-operable implementations of curve25519, even if not in NSS/etc. Please note: Placing it in the spec is not any indication that it is or will be supported. As noted, none of these algorithms are mandatory to implement, for a variety of reasons that include both legal and political concerns. Even the existing (specified) algorithms are features at risk - a lack of inter-operable implementations, or any implementation itself, is sufficient to result in it being removed from any final REC document. I merely note this to set your expectation - the appearance of curve25519 would 1) Be no means an endorsement of the Web Cryptography WG that it is a good curve 2) Be no means an endorsement of the Web Cryptography WG that UAs SHOULD implement 3) Have a higher chance than normal of being removed from the specification in a few months, due to lack of implementation. As such, specifying it now would likely do a greater disservice to developers than you intend, but it's certainly something we can discuss. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2014 01:12:01 UTC