Re: Is the "Key" interface name too generic?

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 5/6/14, 1:09 PM, Mark Watson wrote:
>
>> Is the proposal just to change the name of the Key interface, or also to
>> change things like importKey -> importCryptoKey ?
>>
>
> My proposal was just to change the name of the interface.  importKey
> doesn't typically exist in isolation, and seeing crypto.subtle.importKey()
> is likely to clue people in that this might have something to do with
> crypto.


​Ok, so that proposal is fine with me. No particular opinion on the actual
name.​

...Mark



>
>
> -Boris
>