Re: Is the "Key" interface name too generic?

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 11:48:46 -0400
To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
CC: public-webcrypto@w3.org
Message-ID: <5369045E.30601@mit.edu>

On 5/6/14, 11:37 AM, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> Absent that, CryptoKey seems to be popular internally here. Preferences
> from you?

Given that I suggested CryptoKey in my original mail.... worksforme.  ;)

-Boris

Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 15:49:18 UTC