Re: Is the "Key" interface name too generic? from Boris Zbarsky on 2014-05-06 (public-webcrypto@w3.org from May 2014)

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 08:16:12 -0400
To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
CC: "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5368D28C.30007@mit.edu>

On 4/23/14, 10:14 PM, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> Nope. Hasn't even been discussed really. I'm mostly ambivalent, and am
> happy to avoid squatting on a desirable/confusing prototype name.
> WebCryptoKey, KeyHandle, CryptoKey, etc. Whatever colour the shed looks
> best with.

OK.  How do we go about making a decision here?  I've filed 
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25577 to track this.

-Boris

Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 12:16:43 UTC