- From: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 14:52:10 +0000
- To: "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <540E99C53248CE468F6F7702588ABA2AA48FEE5D@A1GTOEMBXV003.gto.a3c.atos.net>
Anyone having a strong opinion here ? Regards, Virginie From: Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com] Sent: lundi 19 mai 2014 23:06 To: public-webcrypto@w3.org Subject: OperationError vs DataError It seems from various bugs and recent discussions that the distinction between OperationError and DataError is not consistently implemented in the specification nor all that easy to define rigorously and in some cases possibly actively harmful. How would people feel about removing the distinction and returning the same error for all the cases presently covered by OperationError and DataError ? ...Mark ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2014 14:52:48 UTC