- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 06:02:56 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25985 --- Comment #6 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> --- > Let's use a concrete example here. X is RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5. It's popular (still > used for most X.509 certificates, for example), but as noted by INRIA, lacks a > proof, and is a bit long in the tooth. The replacement, RSA-PSS, is recommended > for new systems. OK. Let's stick with this concrete example. How feasible is requiring implementations to support at least one of RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 and RSA-PSS? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2014 06:02:57 UTC