Re: Is a bug needed for?

Yep, we need to define clearly what is considered "inconsistent" and thus
an error and what is considered "consistent" and thus you get what you
specified in the method parameters.

...Mark


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi@google.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:04 PM
> *To:* Jim Schaad
> *Cc:* public-webcrypto@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: Is a bug needed for?
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 28, 2014 9:56 PM, "Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry - being lazy so not looking at the database.
> >
> >
>
> Or the spec ;)
>
> >
> > Do we need to get bugs filed for:
> >
> >
> >
> > 1.       A JWK attribute to defined exportability
> >
>
> No
>
> [JLS] Ok - this looks good - and the error handling looks fine
>
> > 2.       Definitions of what to do when the parameters passed in and the
> parameters in a JWK differ in some way (intersection? Use the JWK versions?
> Error?)
> >
>
> No
>
> [JLS] I have a bit of  problem with this.  What is meant by inconsistent?
> Should this be specified a bit more tightly.   If I pass in an empty array
> from the call and there are things specified in the JWK - is this
> consistent?   If nothing is specified either in my call or in the JWK then
> it would be consistent, but I am not sure what the correct thing to be set
> on the key would be.  If no key usages are specified, do the generate and
> import functions needs to say that there is some default that is used (for
> passing in an empty array)?
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> Both are already in the ED.
> >
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
>