- From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:21:19 -0800
- To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
- Cc: "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 24 January 2014 22:21:46 UTC
Jim, If I can make sure I understand your objection, it's because you don't think other people are skilled enough, nor do you believe polyfills are a valid use case? On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote: > I have a problem with dealing with this issue. While I agree that it > might be useful to allow for having raw ECB access to block encryption > processes. I think that the drawbacks of people actually have access to > the ECB mode and thus getting things wrong is probably too great to allow > for this. I think this is one of those cases where if you want to get a > funny block mode then forcing an implementer to also provide the block > encryption algorithm as well is probably worthwhile. > > > > I would say that this bug should be closed with no action. > > > > Jim > > >
Received on Friday, 24 January 2014 22:21:46 UTC