Since https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478839 in NSS and Fx 3.5.x, I don't believe we've materially moved the needle on unblocking the actual use cases where SEED is used.
I'm increasingly convinced that SEED alone isn't a silver bullet to unblocking the use cases in S. Korea, and so I'm not sure that ACTION-64 is the right one to take up within this WG.
On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:55 PM, Mountie Lee wrote:
> I don't know actually.
>
> my question is based on ACTION-64 (http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/track/actions/64)
>
> regards
> mountie.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote:
> Does any user agent actually plan to implement SEED?
>
> On Sep 30, 2013 11:04 PM, "Mountie Lee" <mountie@paygate.net> wrote:
> Hi. Ryan.
>
> when I see the list of registered algorithms at latest API spec
> ( https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html#algorithms )
>
> I can not find SEED as algorithm name.
>
> what is required to add SEED as algorithm name in spec?
>
> regards
> mountie.
>
> --
> Mountie Lee
>
> PayGate
> CTO, CISSP
> Tel : +82 2 2140 2700
> E-Mail : mountie@paygate.net
>
> =======================================
> PayGate Inc.
> THE STANDARD FOR ONLINE PAYMENT
> for Korea, Japan, China, and the World
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mountie Lee
>
> PayGate
> CTO, CISSP
> Tel : +82 2 2140 2700
> E-Mail : mountie@paygate.net
>
> =======================================
> PayGate Inc.
> THE STANDARD FOR ONLINE PAYMENT
> for Korea, Japan, China, and the World
>