Re: Please review the Web Crypto API before next PWD

Ryan,

Thank you for updating the spec!

The samples look really nice with the Promise syntax. The use of bound functions for logging to the console makes it even nicer ;) .

Kind regards,

Nick Van den Bleeken
R&D Manager

Phone: +32 3 425 41 02
Office fax: +32 3 821 01 71
nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com<mailto:nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
www.inventivedesigners.com


[cid:image001.png@01CBF2F8.1DA19110][cid:image002.png@01CBF2F8.1DA19110][cid:image003.png@01CBF2F8.1DA19110]

On 13 Jun 2013, at 04:39, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com<mailto:sleevi@google.com>>
 wrote:

Thanks for pointing these out Nick. MichaelH also raised them in a
private mail to the editors.

I've just pushed three new changes to
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api that attempt to address the
issues highlighted so far

Update the ECDSA sign/verify algorithm description for the "new"
(read: better described) processing model
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/rev/6f99a5a25a1d

Update the examples:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/rev/a535c724d33e

Rename Futures to Promises:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/rev/c32294bc59e2

As always, the latest draft is
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html ,
and you can always refer to specific versions via
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/log

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Nick Van den Bleeken
<Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com> wrote:
Hi Virgin,

I have two editorial remarks that we probable want to address before
publishing (they are probably being addressed at the moment):
1) They renamed Future to Promise in the DOM4 specification [1].
Consequently , our CryptoOperation should inherit from Promise and the
methods of SubtleCrypto should return Promise<any> and the text should speak
of 'promise' instead of 'future'
2) The examples in section '20. Javascript Example Code' still use the
EventTarget syntax, this should be updated to Promise syntax

Kind regards,

Nick

1: http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#promises

On 11 Jun 2013, at 00:29, GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
wrote:

Dear all,
This is a kind reminder that next Monday  we will formally adopt (or not)
the decision to go for next Public Working Draft on the Web Crypto API
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html
Please review it, and make sure it is acceptable for you as it is. If it is
not, it is the right time to send your comment to the editor.
Regards,
Virginie




________________________________

Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:
http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer




________________________________

Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:
http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer