Re: Please review the Web Crypto API before next PWD

Hi Virgin,

I have two editorial remarks that we probable want to address before publishing (they are probably being addressed at the moment):
1) They renamed Future to Promise in the DOM4 specification [1]. Consequently , our CryptoOperation should inherit from Promise and the methods of SubtleCrypto should return Promise<any> and the text should speak of 'promise' instead of 'future'
2) The examples in section '20. Javascript Example Code' still use the EventTarget syntax, this should be updated to Promise syntax

Kind regards,

Nick

1: http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#promises

On 11 Jun 2013, at 00:29, GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com<mailto:Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>> wrote:

Dear all,
This is a kind reminder that next Monday  we will formally adopt (or not) the decision to go for next Public Working Draft on the Web Crypto API https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html
Please review it, and make sure it is acceptable for you as it is. If it is not, it is the right time to send your comment to the editor.
Regards,
Virginie



________________________________

Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:
http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer

Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2013 12:18:40 UTC