- From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:57:28 -0800
- To: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com> wrote: > Another way to solve this would be to kick the algorithm ID specification over to JOSE. ISTM that it would be a good idea in general for the two groups to use the same algorithm identifiers. > > --Richard I thought we'd firmly put that to bed already as something we were NOT doing, because it's very clear that: 1) JOSE is generally concerned with cipher SUITES, not algorithms 2) JOSE algorithms do not reflect all of the necessary inputs to execute algorithms Kicking it to JOSE is something that I definitely would object to.
Received on Friday, 18 January 2013 19:57:55 UTC