That's cool. Because right now window.getRandomValues() doesn't work within web workers and that's a pain for Cryptocat — we have to work around it. NK On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote: > No. > > While access to the DOM is prohibited, the notion of Events (as > explored in HTML) also derives from a normative reference on the > DOMEVENTS specification, and is core to the Web Workers specification > itself (namely, the onmessage event) > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Nadim Kobeissi <nadim@nadim.cc> wrote: > > Does this dependency affect the API's capability of working within a web > > worker? > > > > > > NK > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com > > > >> wrote: > >> > Why is there a DOM dependency in the API specification? > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Because this is the _Web_ Crypto API, tasked with delivering an API > >> suitable for conforming user agents. > >> > >> Among the many concepts we borrow are the notion of Events, Event > >> Targets, dispatching events, and the lifetime model that is inherently > >> linked to the DOM and HTML specifications. > >> > >> This dependency is reflected in Section 4.1 of our charter. > >> > > >Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 22:31:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:02:00 UTC