Re: Registries and Interoperability from Seetharama Rao Durbha on 2013-02-08 (public-webcrypto@w3.org from February 2013)

From: Seetharama Rao Durbha <S.Durbha@cablelabs.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:32:35 +0000
To: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
CC: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com>, GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
Message-ID: <092CF2723C27B04E84991BFEBE876E9917ED42F4@EXCHANGE.cablelabs.com>

On 2/8/13 2:04 PM, "Richard Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com<mailto:rbarnes@bbn.com>> wrote:

 If there is going to be a consistent set of algorithms, then the API will have to have requirements for UAs.  If there are no requirements for UAs, there is no guarantee of consistency.

I do not think that having a consistent 'naming' is same as 'requiring' the UAs to implement them.

Received on Friday, 8 February 2013 21:33:23 UTC