No objection to closing this. But on a related not, could you provide a link for the group to what you mean when you say a "Promises-style API"? I've had trouble finding good information about this. Thanks, --Richard On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/track/issues/24 > > I would like to propose that we CLOSE ISSUE-24. > > There have been no proposals put forth since it was raised. > > Some members have suggested that synchronous methods be permitted on > the main thread of execution. Implementers objected to this (as, no > doubt, would the TAG), due to the significant performance concerns > they introduce. These objections were re-iterated during the TPAC/Lyon > F2F. > > Further, the transition to a Promises-style API may resolve many of > the concerns regarding scriptability. > > As such, I propose that this issue be closed. >Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 20:03:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:02:00 UTC