- From: Wan-Teh Chang <wtc@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:29:28 -0700
- To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
- Cc: "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>, "wseltzer@w3.org" <wseltzer@w3.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
Hi Virginie and everyone, I am out of the office today. I regret that I won't be able to attend the conference call today. Here are my status update and answers to some of the agenda items: > - addressing ISSUE-27 (specification of AES-CTR mode counter bits): proposal > is to close [ISSUE-27], with the following resolution Keep as written - least > significant bits and interpreted as big endian number. I just emailed my proposed resolution for crypto-ISSUE-27 (aes ctr). > - who will be in TPAC ? I will be in TPAC on Wednesday - Friday. > - topics proposal for our agenda in Lyon (to be discussed/improved) > > [...] > * addressing the crypto issues and functional issues I suspect this comes from my answer to your question at the end of the last conference call. I would like to refine my answer. For me, the crypto issues and functional issues are the most straightforward to resolve. So as an individual WG participant, I can contribute to these two kinds of issues. At TPAC, I think we should address * the high-priority issues, and * the issues whose resolution can best benefit from the high-bandwidth communication of a F2F meeting. The latter seems to imply the most straightforward issues should receive the least attention at TPAC. Wan-Teh
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 15:30:02 UTC