On 11/19/2012 06:14 PM, Mark Watson wrote:
> Virginie,
>
> Do you really mean bi-weekly? i.e. once every two weeks? Or do you
> mean weekly with alternating times.
>
The proposal is biweekly with alternating times, but both meetings would
have decision-making power. HOWEVER, this would mean that the chair has
to attend both meetings (with W3C staff) and that proposals need to be
made to the mailing list ahead of time for both meetings, so both
meetings can have consensus at the meeting.
cheers,
harry
> My vote is neutral, because I would have to leave the 7am PST calls at
> 7.45.
>
> Best,
>
> Mark
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 7:28 AM, "GALINDO Virginie"
> <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com <mailto:Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Just to make things clear, there will be no conference call today.
>>
>> You may take this free time to consider answering the proposed
>> resolution to have our calls on a bi-weekly basis with
>>
>> -one Monday @20:00 UTC (and not 18:00 UTC as stated in my previous email)
>>
>> -one Monday @15:00 UTC
>>
>> If resolution is accepted, we will start next week with this timing.
>> Thanks for indicating your support with +1 or -1.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Virginie
>>
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 20:50:21 UTC